TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc.

Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. and United States v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc.

Ark. & La. Mo. Ry. Co. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., 352 U.S. 1028 (1957)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 11, 1957
Docket
Nos. 125; No. 224
Judges
Douglas, Erankeurter
Citations
352 U.S. 102877 S. Ct. 594

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot.

Mr. Justice Erankeurter and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.

Reported below: 138 F. Supp. 411 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1960: 11963: 119602026peak 1960 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United States, 138 F. Supp. 411 (N.D. Tex. 1956) 31

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list