TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gunaca v. National Labor Relations Board ex rel. Kohler Co.

Gunaca v. National Labor Relations Board ex rel. Kohler Company

Gunaca v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. ex rel. Kohler Co., 353 U.S. 902 (1957)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 25, 1957
Docket
No. 77
Citations
353 U.S. 90277 S. Ct. 6601 L. Ed. 2d 66039 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 26031957 U.S. LEXIS 1634
Cited by 5

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

Upon suggestion of mootness by all the parties, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1972: 21990: 12001: 219722026peak 1972 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  2. Gluckstern v. Sutton574 A.2d 898 (Md. 1990)
  3. Hankla v. Municipal Court26 Cal. App. 3d 342 (1972)
  4. Lee v. Gelineau, 93-3466 (2001)No. 93-3466 C.A. No. 93-3468 (Sup. Ct. R.I. June 28, 2001)
  5. Lee v. Gelineau, 93-3466 (2001)Nos. 93-3466, C.A. No. 93-3468 (Sup. Ct. R.I. Oct. 9, 2001)

Most recent

  1. Lee v. Gelineau, 93-3466 (2001)Nos. 93-3466, C.A. No. 93-3468 (Sup. Ct. R.I. Oct. 9, 2001)
  2. Lee v. Gelineau, 93-3466 (2001)No. 93-3466 C.A. No. 93-3468 (Sup. Ct. R.I. June 28, 2001)
  3. Gluckstern v. Sutton574 A.2d 898 (Md. 1990)
  4. Hankla v. Municipal Court26 Cal. App. 3d 342 (1972)
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list