Hitchcock v. Collenberg
Hitchcock v. Collenberg, 353 U.S. 919 (1957)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford, 352 U. S. 805 ; Dantzler v. Callison, 352 U. S. 939 ; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.