Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to that part of the judgment in favor of Southern Railway Company and that part of the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial. In all other respects, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500 . Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the opinion that the writ should not be granted. See his dissent in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524 . Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons given in Mr. Justice Harlan's opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 559 .
Mr. Justice Burton dissents.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 33 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court6
- U.S. Courts of Appeals15
- Federal District Courts3
- State Highest Courts8
- State Appellate Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Walter Filipek v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., and Third Party and Eastern Rigging Corp., Third Party
- Peter J. Zegan v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. H. W. Massengill
- Wehrli v. Wabash Railroad Company
- Anthony S. Pehowic v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad Company
- Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
Most recent
- The Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. The State of South Carolina, Lexington County, the State Board of Pharmaceutical Examiners, Board of Medical Examiners, United States Food and Drug Administration, the Idaho Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Inc., a Corporation v. The State of Wyoming, the Wyoming State Board of Pharmacy, the Wyoming State Board of Medical Examiners, and the Department of Health and Social Services, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Joseph A. Califano, in His Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of America
- Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration
- State v. Maxfield
- Kreitzer v. Puerto Rico Cars, Inc.
- Amezquita v. Colon
- The National Association of Naturopathic Physicians, Etc. v. The California State Board of Chiropractic Examiners Etc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.