TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Atkinson

Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc. v. Atkinson, 357 U.S. 569 (1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 30, 1958
Docket
No. 756
Judges
Cages, Consideration, Took
Citations
357 U.S. 56978 S. Ct. 13812 L. Ed. 2d 154642 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 23541958 U.S. LEXIS 1840
Cited by 10

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cages.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1958: 11965: 21967: 21968: 21973: 11976: 11977: 119582026peak 1965 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. Sulmonetti448 P.2d 571 (Or. 1968)
  2. Severn v. Adidas Sportschuhfabriken33 Cal. App. 3d 754 (1973)
  3. Shaffer v. Heitner433 U.S. 186 (1977)
  4. Texas v. New Jersey379 U.S. 674 (1965)
  5. Elmer J. Jonnet v. Dollar Savings Bank of the City of New York530 F.2d 1123 (3d Cir. 1976)
  6. Simpson v. Loehmann234 N.E.2d 669 (N.Y. 1967) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Shaffer v. Heitner433 U.S. 186 (1977)
  2. Elmer J. Jonnet v. Dollar Savings Bank of the City of New York530 F.2d 1123 (3d Cir. 1976)
  3. Severn v. Adidas Sportschuhfabriken33 Cal. App. 3d 754 (1973)
  4. State ex rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. Sulmonetti448 P.2d 571 (Or. 1968)
  5. Barker v. Smith290 F. Supp. 709 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)
  6. Simpson v. Loehmann234 N.E.2d 669 (N.Y. 1967) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list