Smith v. United States
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Mr. Chiee Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.
It is clearly within our discretion to refuse to hear a criminal case in error, unless the convicted party, suing out the writ, is where he can be made to respond to any judgment we may render. In this case it is- admitted that the plaintiff in error has. escaped, and is not within the control of the court below, either actually, by being in custody, or constructively, by being out on bail. If we affirm the judgment, he- is not likely to appear to submit to his sentence. If we reverse it and order a new trial, he will appear or not, as he may consider most for his interest. Under such circumstances, we are not inclined to hear and decide what may prove to be only a moot case.
This cause was docketed here Dec. 29, 1870. In due time a brief was filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and the cause has been regularly continued at every term since, no one appearing here in person to represent the plaintiff. At this term we dismissed the writ, on motion of the United States, for want of prosecution, but have since reinstated it on motion of the counsel for the plaintiff in error, wbp now moves to have it set down for argument. This motion we deny, and order *98 that, unless the plaintiff in error submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court below on or before the first day of our next term, the cause be left off the docket after that time.
The People v. Genet, 59 N. Y. 80 ;
Leftwich's Case, 20 Gratt. 723 ;
Commonwealth v. Andrews, 97 Mass. 544 ; see also 31 Me. 592 .
Motion to set down the case for argument denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 24 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(providing that the Supreme Court has the discretion to refuse to hear a criminal case if the defendant has escaped from custody)
-
(announcing that court considered it within its “dis- cretion to refuse to hear a criminal case in error, unless the convicted party, suing out the writ, is where he can be made to respond to any judgment we may render”)
-
(dismissing fugitive's criminal appeal because he was not "where he [could] be made to respond to any judgment we may render")
-
(giving a fugitive until the start of the next term to surrender or face dismissal)
-
(affirming dismissal of FOIA request related to criminal sentence appellant was evading by remaining in Panama)
-
(removing case from docket upon discovery that petitioner had escaped from custody)
-
(refusing to hear case of escaped defendant who remained at large)
-
(“[U]nless the plaintiff in error submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court below . . . , the cause [will] be left off the docket.”)
Cited by 236 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court13
- U.S. Courts of Appeals73
- Federal District Courts19
- Federal Specialty Courts4
- Military Courts2
- State Highest Courts66
- State Appellate Courts50
- State Trial Courts4
- Territorial Courts5
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.