TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Press v. Falk

Press v. Falk, Director, New York State Department of Civil Service

Press v. Falk, 358 U.S. 887 (1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 10, 1958
Docket
No. 233
Citations
358 U.S. 88779 S. Ct. 1293 L. Ed. 2d 1151958 U.S. LEXIS 228
Cited by 35

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Supreme Court of New York, New York County, and Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 35 cases

View all citing references →
1961: 21962: 11963: 11966: 11967: 21969: 11970: 11971: 21972: 11973: 11974: 11976: 11977: 11978: 21979: 21981: 11982: 11983: 11986: 11992: 11993: 11995: 11996: 11997: 22012: 12013: 12017: 319612026peak 2017 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation304 S.E.2d 164 (N.C. 1983)
  2. D. L. Birchfield v. United States of America, and David M. Heritage, Warden, Etc.296 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1961)
  3. Mark Lee Overman v. United States322 F.2d 649 (10th Cir. 1963)
  4. State v. Baines253 S.E.2d 300 (N.C. Ct. App. 1979)
  5. N. C. Monroe Construction Co. v. Coan228 S.E.2d 497 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976)
  6. Chopping v. First National Bank of Lander419 P.2d 710 (Wyo. 1966)

Most recent

  1. L.C. VS. M.A.J. (FV-14-0952-16, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)No. A-4933-15T2 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Sept. 20, 2017)
  2. L.C. v. M.A.J.168 A.3d 93 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2017)
  3. L.C. v. M.A.J.168 A.3d 93 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2017)
  4. In re Cline749 S.E.2d 91 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)
  5. State v. Cullen50 A.3d 686 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2012)
  6. Futrelle v. Duke University488 S.E.2d 635 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list