Gostovich v. Valore

Gostovich v. Valore, Adjudication Officer, Veterans Administration

Gostovich v. Valore, 359 U.S. 916 (1959)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: February 24, 1959
Docket: No. 310
Citations: 359 U.S. 91679 S. Ct. 5923 L. Ed. 2d 5771959 U.S. LEXIS 1560

Cited by 44 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that the trial court did not err by refusing to ask whether prospective jurors would place a greater amount of weight upon the testimony of law enforcement officers over that of the defendants)

Sandidge v. Salen Offshore Drilling Co., Salen Protexa Drilling Co., 764 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1985)
(no error merely in use of jury book to which prosecution has exclusive access)

United States v. Payseur, 501 F.2d 966 (9th Cir. 1974)

Cited by 44 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Hoffmaster v. Veterans' Administration315 F. Supp. 62 (E.D. Pa. 1970)
Roland Sandidge v. Salen Offshore Drilling Company, Salen Protexa Drilling Company764 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1985)
Robert Johnson and Dona Johnson v. United States270 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1959)
Harvin v. United States297 A.2d 774 (D.C. 1972)
United States v. Barnes604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979) · Dissent
Robert G. Baker v. United States401 F.2d 958 (D.C. Cir. 1968)

Most recent

United States v. Raymond Amerson v938 F.2d 116 (8th Cir. 1991)
United States v. Amerson938 F.2d 116 (8th Cir. 1991)
Roland Sandidge v. Salen Offshore Drilling Company, Salen Protexa Drilling Company764 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1985)
People v. Chamness473 N.E.2d 476 (Ill. App. Ct. 1984)
McBride v. State477 A.2d 174 (Del. 1984)
State ex rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.647 P.2d 177 (Ariz. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list