Yszara v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Yszara v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Yszara v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 360 U.S. 932 (1959)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 29, 1959
Docket: No. 946
Citations: 360 U.S. 93279 S. Ct. 14503 L. Ed. 2d 15441959 U.S. LEXIS 690

Cited by 42 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(conduct of a preliminary investigation statutorily required as condition precedent to suit)

Gaf Corp. v. United States, 818 F.2d 901 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
(“[T]hough first representing to the court that it had such information available and implicitly offering it in support of this motion, when it was later served with interrogatories seeking details of such ‘extensive research and consultation,’ claimant asserted its claimed privilege”)

United Nuclear Corp. v. Gen. Atomic Co., 629 P.2d 231 (N.M. 1980)

Cited by 42 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Bros Inc. v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co.320 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1963)
Ex Parte Stewart786 So. 2d 464 (Ala. 2000)
Bros Incorporated v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Company and William E320 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1963)
Afro-Lecon, Inc. v. The United States820 F.2d 1198 (Fed. Cir. 1987)
Gaf Corporation v. United States of America818 F.2d 901 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
Richard Chira v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.634 F.2d 664 (2d Cir. 1980)

Most recent

State v. Neger50 A.3d 591 (Md. 2012)
Bailey v. Gulf Coast Transportation, Inc.139 F. Supp. 2d 1358 (M.D. Fla. 2001)
Ex Parte Stewart786 So. 2d 464 (Ala. 2000)
Stewart v. Birmingham News Co.786 So. 2d 464 (Ala. 2000)
Preston Proctor v. Millar Elevator Service Company8 F.3d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
In re Antoine H.570 A.2d 1239 (Md. 1990)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list