International Ass'n of Machinists v. Street

International Association of Machinists v. Street

Int'l Ass'n of Machinists v. St., 363 U.S. 825 (1960)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 20, 1960
Docket: No. 258
Citations: 363 U.S. 82580 S. Ct. 16044 L. Ed. 2d 15211960 U.S. LEXIS 925

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Georgia. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 361 U. S. 807 .) Argued April 21, 1960.

There having been no certification to the Attorney General of the United States that the constitutionality of § 2 Eleventh of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U. S. C. § 152 Eleventh, an Act of Congress affecting the public interest, is drawn in question, it is ordered that this case be set for reargument in the 1960 Term; and the Court hereby certifies to the Attorney General, pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2403 , that the constitutionality of said statute is drawn in question in the cause.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Hamell561 S.W.2d 357 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
Ezekiel Bates v. Hugh F. Rivers, Executive, District of Columbia Board of Parole323 F.2d 311 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Woods v. Steiner207 F. Supp. 945 (D. Maryland 1962)
Anthony T. Koyce v. United States Board of Parole306 F.2d 759 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Walter Olie Noorlander v. United States Attorney General and His Subordinates465 F.2d 1106 (8th Cir. 1972)
United States ex rel. Kloiber v. Myers237 F. Supp. 682 (E.D. Pa. 1965)

Most recent

State v. DeMarco5 A.3d 527 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010)
Helen D. Woodson v. Attorney General990 F.2d 1344 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
State v. Hamell561 S.W.2d 357 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
Houston Carruthers v. United States525 F.2d 843 (8th Cir. 1975)
Walter Olie Noorlander v. United States Attorney General and His Subordinates465 F.2d 1106 (8th Cir. 1972)
Robert Jewell Landman v. J. J. Clark, Warden456 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list