TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United States

Bhd. of Maint. of Way Employes v. United States, 365 U.S. 801 (1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 23, 1961
Judges
Black, Grant, Stay
Citations
365 U.S. 80181 S. Ct. 4655 L. Ed. 2d 45947 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 24701961 U.S. LEXIS 2085

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

An application was made to Mr. Justice Stewart for an order staying the decree of the three-judge district court in this case insofar as it terminated a temporary - restraining order previously entered. The application was referred by Mr. Justice Stewart to the Court. In the light of the representations made by Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Company, the application is denied without prejudice to its renewal upon the prompt docketing of the appeal.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 38 cases

View all citing references →
1961: 31962: 11965: 41966: 21968: 11969: 21970: 21971: 21972: 11973: 11974: 21975: 11976: 21977: 11978: 51985: 21993: 11996: 11999: 12002: 12004: 12008: 119612026peak 1978 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Jeffrey Clinton Raines536 F.2d 796 (8th Cir. 1976)
  2. State v. Harada41 P.3d 174 (Haw. 2002)
  3. R. Milo Gilbert v. United States291 F.2d 586 (9th Cir. 1961)
  4. State v. Chavez531 P.2d 603 (N.M. Ct. App. 1974)
  5. United States v. Jose Alejandro, Also Known as Green Eyes368 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2004)
  6. United States v. Ospina618 F. Supp. 1486 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)

Most recent

  1. State v. Sitaras942 A.2d 1071 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008)
  2. United States v. Jose Alejandro, Also Known as Green Eyes368 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2004)
  3. State v. Harada41 P.3d 174 (Haw. 2002)
  4. Coleman v. United States728 A.2d 1230 (D.C. 1999)
  5. State v. Dixon924 P.2d 181 (Haw. 1996)
  6. United States v. Luis Francisco Contreras-Ceballos999 F.2d 432 (9th Cir. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list