Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.

Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. United States v. Fruehauf Haug et ux. v. United States West v. United States Reinthaler v. United States

Eastern R.R. Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 875 (1961)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: April 3, 1961
Docket: Nos. 50; No. 91; No. 93; No. 73; No. 74
Citations: 365 U.S. 87581 S. Ct. 899

Cited by 4 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ante, p. 127;

ante, p. 146;

ante, p. 811;

ante, p. 819; and ante, p. 819. Petitions for rehearing denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(Sherman Act does not apply to railroads' lobbying even though sole motive was to destroy competition from truckers and even though railroads used third parties to wage their campaign)

Vill. Supermarket v. Mayfair, 634 A.2d 1381 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Duke & Company Inc., a Corporation v. Thomas J. Foerster, Individually and as Commissioners of the County of Allegheny521 F.2d 1277 (3d Cir. 1975)
Trepel v. Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital354 N.W.2d 341 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984)
Village Supermarket v. Mayfair634 A.2d 1381 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)
Azzar v. PRIMEBANK, FSB499 N.W.2d 793 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993)

Most recent

Village Supermarket v. Mayfair634 A.2d 1381 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)
Azzar v. PRIMEBANK, FSB499 N.W.2d 793 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993)
Trepel v. Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital354 N.W.2d 341 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984)
Duke & Company Inc., a Corporation v. Thomas J. Foerster, Individually and as Commissioners of the County of Allegheny521 F.2d 1277 (3d Cir. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list