TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Erskine v. Milwaukee and St

Erskine v. Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company; Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company v. Erskine

Erskine v. Milwaukee & St, 94 U.S. 619 (1877)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 13, 1877
Docket
No. 178
Judges
Waite
Citations
94 U.S. 61924 L. Ed. 1331876 U.S. LEXIS 1919
Headnotes
A penalty of $1,000 is the Only liability incurred by a railroad company for failing to comply with the provisions of sect. 122 of the internal revenue act of June 30, 1864 (13 Stat. 284), as amended by the act of July 13, 1866 (14 id. 138).
Summary
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. This was an action brought by the Milwaukee and St. Paul Bailway Company against Erskine, collector of internal revenue for the First Collection District of the State of Wisconsin, to recover $17,296.12 paid by the company under protest in the year 1870, and by him claimed to be due from it for taxes under the laws of the United States. There was a judgment in favor of the company for $8655.07 and costs. Each party excepted to the rulings of the court below, and sued out a writ of error. The exceptions of the company were' abandoned here. The only question submitted was, whether the company was liable for any sum beyond the penalty of $1,000 for its default in paying the tax of five per cent upon the amount paid to the holders of the coupons, which represented the interest on its bonds, and upon the dividends payable to its stockholders. The court below held that the company was not so liable.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Waite

Me. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

No error has been assigned by the railroad company upon this record, for the reason that the rulings to which the company took exceptions are all sustained by our decisions in Barnes v. Railroad Companies, 17 Wall. 294 , and Stockdale v Insurance Companies, 20 id. 323 .

We think that the Circuit Court was right in holding that the only penalty to which the company was liable for default under sect. 122 of the internal revenue act of June 30, 1864, 13 Stat. 284 , as amended July 13, 1866, 14 id. 138, was that of $1,000 specially provided for in that section. The penalty of five per cent and interest at the rate of one per cent per month, apply only to cases of default in the payment of duties upon incomes imposed by sect. 119 as amended. 13 id. 283 : 14 id. 480.

Judgment affirmed, the costs incident to each writ to be paid by the party suing it out.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1879–1880: 11897–1898: 11899–1900: 11907–1908: 11913–1914: 118792026peak 1879 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Elliott v. Railroad Company99 U.S. 573 (1879)
  2. Howe Grain & Mercantile Co. v. Jones51 S.W. 24 (Tex. App. 1899)
  3. United States v. Mares88 P. 1128 (N.M. 1907)
  4. Labadie v. United States1897 OK 80, 51 P. 666
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. District of Columbia39 App. D.C. 565 (D.C. Cir. 1913)

Most recent

  1. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. District of Columbia39 App. D.C. 565 (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  2. United States v. Mares88 P. 1128 (N.M. 1907)
  3. Howe Grain & Mercantile Co. v. Jones51 S.W. 24 (Tex. App. 1899)
  4. Labadie v. United States1897 OK 80, 51 P. 666
  5. Elliott v. Railroad Company99 U.S. 573 (1879)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Barnes v. the Railroads, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 294 (1873) 16

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list