Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Switchmen's Union

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Switchmen's Union of North America

Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Switchmen's Union, 370 U.S. 936 (1962)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 25, 1962
Docket: No. 237
Citations: 370 U.S. 93682 S. Ct. 1578

Cited by 42 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(§ 4 accommodated so as to place burden on plaintiff to show Railway Labor Act violated as condition precedent to injunction)

N.Y. Tel. Co. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am., Afl-Cio, 445 F.2d 39 (2d Cir. 1971)

Cited by 42 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

REA Express, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks358 F. Supp. 760 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)
Piedmont Aviation, Inc., a Corporation v. Air Line Pilots Association, International, an Unincorporated Association416 F.2d 633 (4th Cir. 1969)
Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.682 F. Supp. 1003 (W.D. Mo. 1988)
Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n International518 F. Supp. 203 (S.D. Tex. 1981)
Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.546 F.2d 530 (3d Cir. 1976)
Hansen v. Rothaus730 P.2d 662 (Wash. 1986)

Most recent

McLean-McNabb v. Peltier13 Am. Tribal Law 377 (2016)
In re SS271 B.R. 240 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2002)
V. M. v. S. S. (In re S. S.)271 B.R. 240 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2002)
Braddy v. Nationwide Mutual Liability Insurance470 S.E.2d 820 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996)
Sampsell v. B & I Welding Serv. & Cons.638 So. 2d 477 (La. Ct. App. 1994)
United States v. Washington836 F. Supp. 192 (D. Vt. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list