Fong v. United States

Fong, trading as Asia Development Corp. v. United States

Fong v. United States, 370 U.S. 938 (1962)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 25, 1962
Docket: No. 955
Citations: 370 U.S. 93882 S. Ct. 15848 L. Ed. 2d 8071962 U.S. LEXIS 896

Cited by 68 5 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that firm was not in a failing condition were it had a positive net worth)

California v. Sutter Health Sys., 130 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (N.D. Cal. 2001)
(“Certainly, a defendant offering a sum in settlement of a suit asking, among other things, for an injunction against certain conduct, would not understand that a similar demand could be asserted the day after settlement.”)

At & T Commc'ns of Va., Inc. v. Bell Atl.-Va., Inc., 35 F. Supp. 2d 493 (E.D. Va. 1999)
(refusal to return to taking of deposition)

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Research Automation Corp., Konstantinos M. Tserpes, 521 F.2d 585 (2d Cir. 1975)
($650,000 punitive damages award deemed “monstrous”)

Simmons v. Avisco, Local 713, Textile Workers Union of Am., 350 F.2d 1012 (4th Cir. 1965)

Cited by 68 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Mastroni-Mucker v. Allstate Insurance976 A.2d 510 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009)
Meindl v. Genesys Pacific Technologies, Inc.18 P.3d 895 (Haw. 2001)
United States v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation264 F. Supp. 439 (N.D. Cal. 1967)
United States v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company253 F. Supp. 129 (N.D. Cal. 1966)
Oaks v. Grocers Wholesale, Inc.377 P.2d 1001 (Alaska 1963)
Barry G. Lew, M.D. v. Kona Hospital754 F.2d 1420 (9th Cir. 1985)

Most recent

Moore v. MannNo. 3:13-cv-02771 (M.D. Penn. Aug. 25, 2022)
Mastroni-Mucker v. Allstate Insurance976 A.2d 510 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009)
Jennings v. Reed885 A.2d 482 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005)
Millgard Corp. v. White Oak Corp.224 F. Supp. 2d 425 (D. Conn. 2002)
Three H Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.256 F. Supp. 2d 568 (W.D. Tex. 2002)
Meindl v. Genesys Pacific Technologies, Inc.18 P.3d 895 (Haw. 2001)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list