TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Malory v. McGettrick

Malory v. McGettrick, Sheriff of Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Malory v. McGettrick, 372 U.S. 949 (1963)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 18, 1963
Docket
No. 858
Citations
372 U.S. 94983 S. Ct. 9459 L. Ed. 2d 9741963 U.S. LEXIS 2016

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Motion of the National Lawyers Guild for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion of the American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 11966: 11967: 21970: 11971: 11979: 11980: 21985: 11993: 119652026peak 1967 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lampkin v. Connor239 F. Supp. 757 (D.D.C. 1965)
  2. United States v. Hoffa382 F.2d 856 (6th Cir. 1967) · Dissent
  3. Federation for American Immigration Reform v. Klutznick486 F. Supp. 564 (D.D.C. 1980)
  4. Daisy E. Lampkin v. John T. Connor, Secretary of Commerce360 F.2d 505 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  5. Victor Sharrow v. George H. Brown, Census Bureau Director, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20233447 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1971)
  6. Tretick v. Layman619 A.2d 201 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1993)

Most recent

  1. Tretick v. Layman619 A.2d 201 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1993)
  2. Kackley v. State493 A.2d 364 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1985)
  3. Sharrow v. Fish501 F. Supp. 202 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)
  4. Federation for American Immigration Reform v. Klutznick486 F. Supp. 564 (D.D.C. 1980)
  5. People v. Burke389 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. App. Ct. 1979)
  6. Victor Sharrow v. George H. Brown, Census Bureau Director, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20233447 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list