Patzke v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Patzke v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 373 U.S. 908 (1963)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Supreme Court of Michigan. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(same result where completed customer contracts, or accounts receivable, were sold by a cash-basis corporation under Section 337)
-
(Commissioner empowered under section 446(b) of the Code to impose percentage-of-completion accounting method on corporation which assigned uncompleted construction contract even though profitability of contract at time of assignment was uncertain)
-
(statute of limitations at issue in a private anti-trust action)
Cited by 68 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals33
- Federal District Courts26
- Federal Specialty Courts1
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts7
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Lake Farms, Inc., Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Lake Farms
- Midland-Ross Corporation, Transferee of Surface Combustion Corporation v. United States
- Robert H. Storz, Transferee of Storz-Wachob-Bender Co., a Dissolved Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Louis Spitalny and Betty Spitalny, His Wife v. United States of America, William Erdwurm and Bart F
- Spitalny v. United States
- Bishop v. United States
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.