United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 375 U.S. 966 (1964)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: January 6, 1964
Docket: No. 563
Citations: 375 U.S. 96684 S. Ct. 48411 L. Ed. 2d 4151964 U.S. LEXIS 2062

Cited by 51 4 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(failure of owner to remove forfeits wreck to government “in the event” Secretary uses Wreck Act)

Buffalo Bayou Transp. Co. v. United States, 375 F.2d 675 (5th Cir. 1967)
(whether pinball machines are gambling devices depends on use and not on how labeled or designed)

Dissmeyer v. State, 249 P.3d 444 (Kan. 2011)
("Judges are human, but they are also specially trained to decide cases on the evidence. They are conscious of the dangers of irrelevant facts and zealously guard themselves against being influenced by any facts not obtained from the evidence.")

Commonwealth v. Council, 421 A.2d 623 (Pa. 1980)

Cited by 51 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Reico Lonnie Greene442 F.2d 1285 (10th Cir. 1971)
Bernard Austin v. United States382 F.2d 129 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
United States v. Millard Bowie892 F.2d 1494 (10th Cir. 1990)
China Union Lines, Ltd., Mitsubishi International Corporation, Lan Jing-Chau, Armement Deppe, S.A. v. A. O. Andersen & Co., American Cyanamid Company364 F.2d 769 (5th Cir. 1966)
United States v. William Harry Hack, Jr., Lucas Clinton Owens782 F.2d 862 (10th Cir. 1986)
Commonwealth v. Council421 A.2d 623 (Pa. 1980)

Most recent

Dissmeyer v. State249 P.3d 444 (Kan. 2011)
Attorney General Opinion No.(Kan. Att'y Gen. Nov. 5, 1997)
United States v. Calvin Cox929 F.2d 1511 (10th Cir. 1991)
United States v. Millard Bowie892 F.2d 1494 (10th Cir. 1990)
Scott v. State491 So. 2d 1094 (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
United States v. David William Roberts783 F.2d 767 (9th Cir. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list