Taylor v. Johnson
Taylor v. Johnson, Trustee
Taylor v. Johnson, 376 U.S. 951 (1964)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(while court views provision in Mexican Constitution requiring formal complaint in some cases as “primarily for the courts of that country to interpret,” oral statements of Mexican judge “would seem to satisfy” the requirement)
-
(extradition order valid despite refusal to allow certain witnesses to testify)
-
(“With [Judge Learned Hand’s] customary eloquence he stated that 'the duty of ascertaining [the] meaning [of a statute] is difficult at best, and one certain way of missing it is by reading it literally_’")
-
(extradition warrant was not invalid because complaint upon which it was based was made by assistant United States attorney who had no personal knowledge of facts or because it failed to specify details of crime)
Cited by 109 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Nordstrom v. White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corp.
- Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses' Examining Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tamiment, Inc.
- Borodin v. Ashcroft
- Bridges Scott v. The Ss Ciudad De Ibague, Her Engines, Tackle, Furniture and Apparel, and Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S. A.
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Bohemia River Associates, Ltd.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.