Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. United States

Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Ry. Co. v. United States, 377 U.S. 964 (1964)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 8, 1964
Docket: No. 983
Citations: 377 U.S. 96484 S. Ct. 164412 L. Ed. 2d 7351964 U.S. LEXIS 1085

Cited by 47 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(jurisdiction of trial court cannot be attacked in suspension proceeding)

In re Larsen, 655 A.2d 239 (Ct. Jud. Disc. Pa 1994)

Cited by 47 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Federal Power Commission376 F.2d 161 (10th Cir. 1967)
Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power Commission376 F.2d 161 (10th Cir. 1967)
Placid Oil Company, Sola II v. Federal Power Commission483 F.2d 880 (5th Cir. 1973)
Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. First Arlington National Bank454 N.E.2d 723 (Ill. App. Ct. 1983)
Local 165, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Bradley499 N.E.2d 577 (Ill. App. Ct. 1986)
Consumer Federation of America v. Federal Power Commission, the Public Service Commission for the State of New York515 F.2d 347 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

Most recent

In re Larsen655 A.2d 239 (Ct. Jud. Disc. Pa 1994)
Towns of Concord, Norwood, and Wellesley, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Boston Edison Company955 F.2d 67 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
Continental Bank N.A. v. Everett760 F. Supp. 713 (N.D. Ill. 1991)
David L. Schroeder and Tana Schroeder v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Skyline Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service831 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1987)
Schroeder v. Commissioner831 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1987)
Madison Associates v. Bass511 N.E.2d 690 (Ill. App. Ct. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list