Oneida Tribe of Indians v. United States
Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin v. United States
Oneida Tribe of Indians v. United States, 379 U.S. 946 (1964)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(prosecution not barred where extortionate conduct was committed beyond the period of limitations but the payments were received within the period)
-
(payments to induce truckers to perform tasks already required under their pre-existing contract)
-
(fear of wrongfully threatened economic loss also satisfies Hobbs Act)
-
(principal need not be tried, convicted, or even identified)
-
(duty of care does “not reach the insurer’s level”)
Cited by 119 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals65
- Federal District Courts29
- Federal Specialty Courts12
- State Highest Courts6
- State Appellate Courts7
Relies on it most ⓘ
- The Confederated Tribes Of The Colville Reservation v. United States
- United States v. F. W. Standefer
- United States v. Sweig
- United States v. Charles Thomas Bryan and James Eston Echols. Appeal of Charles Thomas Bryan
- Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. United States
- United States v. Frank Mazzei
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.