TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. United States

St. Luke's Hospital Association of Cleveland v. United States

St. Luke's Hosp. Ass'n v. United States, 379 U.S. 963 (1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 18, 1965
Docket
No. 579
Citations
379 U.S. 96385 S. Ct. 65213 L. Ed. 2d 5571965 U.S. LEXIS 2063

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 139 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 11966: 61967: 31968: 51969: 31970: 11972: 81973: 61974: 21975: 71976: 41977: 31978: 11979: 11980: 61981: 71982: 51983: 61984: 51985: 51986: 61987: 71988: 21989: 31990: 31991: 31992: 31993: 51994: 21996: 31997: 31998: 11999: 12000: 32002: 32004: 12007: 12008: 12009: 12011: 12015: 119652026peak 1972 · 8

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Arroyo973 A.2d 1254 (Conn. 2009)
  2. F & G Scrolling Mouse, L.L.C. v. IBM Corp.190 F.R.D. 385 (M.D.N.C. 1999)
  3. Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A., De C v. V. United States291 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
  4. Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.791 F. Supp. 113 (E.D. La. 1992)
  5. Amf Tuboscope, Inc., and American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Joe H. Cunningham and Arrow Pipe Service, Inc.352 F.2d 150 (10th Cir. 1965)
  6. Verdia JONES v. Robert BIRDSONG679 F.2d 24 (5th Cir. 1982) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. State v. AndersonNo. AC35432 (Conn. App. Ct. June 30, 2015)
  2. Baldwin v. United States823 F. Supp. 2d 1087 (N. Mar. I. 2011)
  3. State v. Arroyo973 A.2d 1254 (Conn. 2009)
  4. Unidev, L.L.C. v. Housing Authority of New Orleans250 F.R.D. 268 (E.D. La. 2008)
  5. Rivera Rosa v. Citibank, N.A.549 F. Supp. 2d 155 (D.P.R. 2007)
  6. Disparte v. Corporate Executive Board223 F.R.D. 7 (D.D.C. 2004)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list