TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Henry v. Mississippi

Henry v. Mississippi City of El Paso v. Simmons Stanford v. Texas Cox v. Louisiana Goldner v. Silver, District Attorney, Kings County, New York Gianfrancesco v. Ohio Kehoe v. Boyle, Sakrete of Northern California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board Locklin, dba Radiant Color Co. v. Switzer Brothers, Inc. Estes v. United States Spector v. United States

Henry v. Mississippi, 380 U.S. 926 (1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 1, 1965
Docket
Nos. 6; No. 38; No. 40; No. 49; No. 415; Nos. 510 and 542; No. 547; No. 556; No. 581; No. 601; No. 614
Citations
380 U.S. 92685 S. Ct. 883
Cited by 10

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

379 U. S. 443 ;

379 U. S. 497 ;

379 U. S. 476 ;

379 U. S. 559 ;

379 U. S. 959 ;

379 U. S. 932 ;

379 U. S. 959 ;

379 U. S. 961 ;

379 U. S. 962 ;

379 U. S. 964 ; and 379 U. S. 966 .

Petitions for rehearing denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 11967: 11969: 21970: 21972: 11973: 11978: 11980: 119652026peak 1969 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Degraffenreid173 N.W.2d 317 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
  2. People v. Brocato169 N.W.2d 483 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
  3. Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970)
  4. Harrell v. City of Lewiston506 P.2d 470 (Idaho 1973)
  5. Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment383 A.2d 7 (D.C. 1978)
  6. Town of Glocester v. Tillinghast416 A.2d 1178 (R.I. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Town of Glocester v. Tillinghast416 A.2d 1178 (R.I. 1980)
  2. Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment383 A.2d 7 (D.C. 1978)
  3. Harrell v. City of Lewiston506 P.2d 470 (Idaho 1973)
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Canton Sign Co.457 F.2d 832 (6th Cir. 1972)
  5. Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corporation429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970)
  6. Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.429 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Henry v. Mississippi, 379 U.S. 443 (1965) 869
Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 559 (1965) 739
Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476 (1965) 718
City of El Paso v. Simmons, 379 U.S. 497 (1965) 283

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list