TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cooks v. Brotherhood of Railway Carmen, Local No. 991 & Local No. 783

Cooks v. Brotherhood of Railway Carmen of America, Local No. 991 & Local No. 783

Cooks v. Bhd. of Ry. Carmen, Local No. 991 & Local No. 783, 380 U.S. 975 (1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 26, 1965
Docket
No. 943
Citations
380 U.S. 97585 S. Ct. 133614 L. Ed. 2d 27059 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 20631 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 97041965 U.S. LEXIS 2358
Cited by 35

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 35 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 21966: 21967: 61968: 31969: 31971: 21972: 41974: 11975: 11976: 11979: 11980: 11981: 11982: 21984: 11985: 11987: 11990: 11994: 119652026peak 1967 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Turzynski268 F. Supp. 847 (N.D. Ill. 1967)
  2. Jackson v. State541 P.2d 23 (Alaska 1975)
  3. Norman L. Birl v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director Texas Department of Corrections660 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1981)
  4. Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation. Munitrad Systems, Inc. v. Standard and Poor's Corporation672 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1982)
  5. United States v. Carl P. Fogel829 F.2d 77 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  6. State v. Patterson645 A.2d 535 (Conn. 1994)

Most recent

  1. State v. Patterson645 A.2d 535 (Conn. 1994)
  2. United States v. Tepfer748 F. Supp. 310 (E.D. Pa. 1990)
  3. United States v. Carl P. Fogel829 F.2d 77 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  4. Chang v. University of Rhode Island606 F. Supp. 1161 (D.R.I. 1985)
  5. Continental Motel Brokers, Inc. v. Bill B. Blankenship, Arthur Fleck739 F.2d 226 (6th Cir. 1984)
  6. Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation. Munitrad Systems, Inc. v. Standard and Poor's Corporation672 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list