Andrews Van Lines, Inc. v. United States
Andrews Van Lines, Inc. v. United States, 382 U.S. 67 (1965)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Gregory Paul Mason v. Ronald A. Brooks Edwin Meese
- Faustino Rafael Murgia-Melendrez v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Answering, Inc. v. Corporation Commission
- Andrews Van Lines, Inc. v. United States
- Petition for Naturalization of Millan
- United Van Lines, Inc. v. United States
Most recent
- Gregory Paul Mason v. Ronald A. Brooks Edwin Meese
- Answering, Inc. v. Corporation Commission
- Faustino Rafael Murgia-Melendrez v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Petition for Naturalization of Millan
- Andrews Van Lines, Inc. v. United States
- United Van Lines, Inc. v. United States
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.