Wallach v. Chandler

Wallach v. Chandler, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court

Wallach v. Chandler, 382 U.S. 806 (1965)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 11, 1965
Docket: No. 91
Citations: 382 U.S. 80686 S. Ct. 10315 L. Ed. 2d 1131965 U.S. LEXIS 563

Cited by 15 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(noting that claims presented on direct review may not be relitigated on state habeas)

King v. White, 839 F. Supp. 718 (C.D. Cal. 1993)

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Billy G. Byers740 F.2d 1104 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
State v. Clemente353 A.2d 723 (Conn. 1974)
United States v. Joseph Covello410 F.2d 536 (2d Cir. 1969)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7278, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,963 Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Anthony Cornell Bean, Real-Party-In-Interest96 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 1996)
Anthony Paul Maxwell v. G. W. Sumner, Warden, San Quentin Prison673 F.2d 1031 (9th Cir. 1982)
United States v. Vankirk Moore and Harold Burnell571 F.2d 76 (2d Cir. 1978)

Most recent

Ratliff v. Hedgepeth712 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (C.D. Cal. 2010)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7278, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,963 Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Anthony Cornell Bean, Real-Party-In-Interest96 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 1996)
Calderon v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California96 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 1996)
King v. White839 F. Supp. 718 (C.D. Cal. 1993)
Karis v. Vasquez828 F. Supp. 1449 (E.D. Cal. 1993)
United States v. Billy G. Byers740 F.2d 1104 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list