Rucker v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.
Rucker, Guardian v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.
Rucker v. Fifth Ave. Coach Lines, Inc., 382 U.S. 815 (1965)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(bringing of class action tolls statute of limitations for all members of class)
-
(provision of U.N. Charter not self-executing and does not invalidate provision of immigration law)
-
(property within original scope despite preliminary map that did not include property)
-
(“there must be a practical method for combining these small claims, and- the representative action provides that method. The holders of one or two of the debentures in the present action could hardly afford to take the risk of an individual action.”)
Cited by 91 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals25
- Federal District Courts56
- Federal Specialty Courts1
- State Highest Courts5
- State Appellate Courts4
Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- In re Prudential Securities Inc.
- Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.
- Laughlin v. United States
- Reliance Insurance Company, Counter- v. Capital Bancshares, Inc./capital Bank, Counter- Sunbelt Bancorp/sunbelt Savings Association of Texas, Counter- v. International Insurance Company, Counter-
- French American Banking Corp. v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A.
- Reliance Insurance v. Capital Bancshares, Inc./Capital Bank
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.