TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brookhart v. Ohio

Brookhart v. Ohio, 382 U.S. 968 (1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 17, 1966
Docket
No. 657
Citations
382 U.S. 96815 L. Ed. 2d 463

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Sup. Ct. Ohio. (Cer-tiorari granted, ante, p. 810.) Motion of petitioner to substitute Martin A. Janis, Director of the Ohio Department of Mental Hygiene and Correction, as party respondent in place of the State of Ohio granted.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (proceeding before study group appointed by S.E.C. merely investigatory hearing not conducted in manner essential to constitute quasi-judicial administrative proceeding)

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1970: 11981: 11982: 21983: 11984: 11985: 11988: 11989: 21990: 11991: 11993: 11996: 119702026peak 1982 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Barry Brister and Karen Brister v. A.W.I., Inc.946 F.2d 350 (5th Cir. 1991)
  2. Story v. Shelter Bay Company760 P.2d 368 (Wash. Ct. App. 1988)
  3. Continental Oil Company v. Bonanza Corporation, and Republic Insurance Company706 F.2d 1365 (5th Cir. 1983)
  4. McDermott v. Hughley561 A.2d 1038 (Md. 1989)
  5. Continental Oil Company v. Bonanza Corporation and Republic Insurance Company677 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1982)
  6. Gersh v. Ambrose434 A.2d 547 (Md. 1981)

Most recent

  1. Richmond v. Thompson922 P.2d 1343 (Wash. 1996)
  2. In re Adventure Bound Sports, Inc.837 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D. Ga. 1993)
  3. Barry Brister and Karen Brister v. A.W.I., Inc.946 F.2d 350 (5th Cir. 1991)
  4. Delaune v. Saint Marine Transportation Co.749 F. Supp. 1463 (E.D. La. 1990)
  5. McDermott v. Hughley561 A.2d 1038 (Md. 1989)
  6. Deshotels v. SHRM Catering Services, Inc.538 So. 2d 988 (La. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list