E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Maloney

E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Maloney and Maloney v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.

E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Maloney, 383 U.S. 948 (1966)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: March 21, 1966
Docket: Nos. 977; No. 1093
Judges: Consideration, Petitions, Took
Citations: 383 U.S. 94886 S. Ct. 120116 L. Ed. 2d 2101966 U.S. LEXIS 2060

Cited by 95 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 122 U. S. App. D. C. 268, 352 P. 2d 936 .

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(decided prior to the effective date of the Federal Rules of Evidence)

United States v. McLennan, 563 F.2d 943 (9th Cir. 1977)

Cited by 95 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Myers v. American Dental Ass'n695 F.2d 716 (3d Cir. 1982)
United States v. Haldeman559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
United States v. Harry R559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
Schwager v. United States326 F. Supp. 1081 (E.D. Pa. 1971)
Grant v. Pitchford565 F. Supp. 430 (S.D. Cal. 1983)
Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.116 Cal. App. 3d 311 (1981)

Most recent

In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings Ag358 F.3d 288 (3d Cir. 2004)
In re AutomotiveNo. 02-4272 (3d Cir. Feb. 13, 2004)
Overseas Partners, Inc. v. Progen Musavirlik Ve Yonetim Hizmetleri, Ltd. Sikerti15 F. Supp. 2d 47 (D.D.C. 1998)
Magwood v. State689 So. 2d 959 (Ala. Crim. App. 1996)
Icon Industrial Controls Corp. v. Cimetrix, Inc.921 F. Supp. 375 (W.D. La. 1996)
United States v. David W. Lanier33 F.3d 639 (6th Cir. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Day v. State, 1960 OK CR 46, 352 P.2d 935	2

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list