Lucignano v. United States
Lucignano v. United States, 384 U.S. 884 (1966)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. Westmoreland
- United States v. Hughes
- United States v. Honorable Sarah T. Hughes, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, Gifford-Hill-American, Inc. v. Honorable Sarah T. Hughes, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, United Concrete Pipe Corporation and Lloyd R
- George E. Brown v. The State of New Jersey
Most recent
- George E. Brown v. The State of New Jersey
- United States v. Honorable Sarah T. Hughes, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, Gifford-Hill-American, Inc. v. Honorable Sarah T. Hughes, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, United Concrete Pipe Corporation and Lloyd R
- United States v. Hughes
- United States v. Westmoreland
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.