Saigh ex rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Busch

Saigh ex rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Busch, 384 U.S. 942 (1966)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: May 16, 1966
Docket: No. 1178
Citations: 384 U.S. 94286 S. Ct. 146516 L. Ed. 2d 5411966 U.S. LEXIS 1683

Cited by 46 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

St. Louis Ct. App. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that “except for those specialized, rare assertions characterized as judicial admissions, a party is entitled to explain an admission and even to retract it.”)

Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., & David C. Tjosvold, 839 F.2d 407 (8th Cir. 1988)

Cited by 46 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Thomas M. Hannigan and Tru-Han Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.410 F.2d 285 (7th Cir. 1969)
State v. Thompson644 P.2d 608 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. Tjosvold839 F.2d 407 (8th Cir. 1988)
H. E. Collins and Joetta Collins, Surviving Parents and Personal Representatives of Karen Collins, Deceased v. Wayne Corporation621 F.2d 777 (5th Cir. 1980)
United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. Ciccone605 F.2d 762 (5th Cir. 1979)
State ex rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer932 P.2d 1145 (Or. 1997)

Most recent

Vazquez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (In re Vazquez)221 B.R. 222 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1998)
J. Aron & Co. v. Cargill Marine Terminal, Inc.998 F. Supp. 700 (E.D. La. 1998)
State ex rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer932 P.2d 1145 (Or. 1997)
Walker v. Bentley660 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
American Home Assurance Company v. American President Lines, Ltd.44 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 1994)
In re Sumpter171 B.R. 835 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list