McKee v. New York Central Railroad

McKee v. New York Central Railroad Co.

McKee v. N.Y. Cent. R.R., 384 U.S. 1004 (1966)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 20, 1966
Docket: No. 1259
Judges: Consideration, Took
Citations: 384 U.S. 100486 S. Ct. 192116 L. Ed. 2d 10181966 U.S. LEXIS 1176

Cited by 47 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that plaintiffs counsel’s failure to offer an explanation for not filing timely affidavits in support of its motion for summary judgment was not “excusable neglect” under Rule 6(b))

Casanova v. Marathon Corp., 499 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 2007)

Cited by 47 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Peralta v. Martinez564 P.2d 194 (N.M. Ct. App. 1977)
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.400 F. Supp. 497 (D.S.C. 1975)
Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc.705 F.2d 1515 (9th Cir. 1983)
United States v. Anthony J. Dichiarinte445 F.2d 126 (7th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Clarence Christian Nelson718 F.2d 315 (9th Cir. 1983)
South Atlantic Financial Corp., Etc., Debtors. Biscayne 21 Condominium Association, Inc. v. South Atlantic Financial Corp., Etc.767 F.2d 814 (11th Cir. 1985)

Most recent

Casanova v. Marathon Corp.499 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 2007)
United States v. Hall, Dennis324 F.3d 720 (D.C. Cir. 2003)
Wilson v. Sysco Food Services of Dallas, Inc.940 F. Supp. 1003 (N.D. Tex. 1996)
United States v. Shecham Lafayette, United States of America v983 F.2d 1102 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
Auto Specialties Manufacturing Co. v. Sachs (In re Auto Specialties Manufacturing Co.)133 B.R. 384 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1991)
In re N.P. Mining Co.124 B.R. 846 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1990)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list