TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Strom-Sell v. COUNCIL FOR CONCERNED CITIZENS, INC.

Paula STROM-SELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNCIL FOR CONCERNED CITIZENS, INC., Toni Austad, William Wilkerson, President, Board of Directors, Defendants and Appellees

Strom-Sell v. Council FOR Concerned Citizens, Inc., 2000 ND 19, 606 N.W.2d 108
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
North Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 22, 2000
Docket
No. 990295
Judges
Vande Walle, Maring, Neumann, Sandstrom, Kapsner
Citations
606 N.W.2d 1082000 ND 192000 N.D. LEXIS 252000 WL 199433

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Paula Strom-Sell appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion for a stay of execution. Essentially, Strom-Sell’s present appeal challenges an award of costs and disbursements which was part of a judgment previously affirmed by this Court in Strom-Sell v. Council for Concerned, Citizens, Inc., 1999 ND 132 , 597 N.W.2d 414 . We conclude this appeal is frivolous and completely without merit, and therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

[¶ 2] In addition, this Court awards Ap-pellees costs on appeal to be taxed and allowed in the court below under Rule 39, N.D.R.App.P., and damages in the amount of $1,000 under Rule 38, N.D.R.App.P. Under Rule 38, this Court may award “just damages and single or double costs including reasonable attorney’s fees” if we determine an appeal is frivolous. We have stated an appeal is frivolous if it is “flagrantly groundless, devoid of merit, or demonstrates persistence in the course of litigation which could be seen as evidence of bad faith.”

Matter of Estate of Opatz, 554 N.W.2d 813, 817 (N.D.1996). This is such an appeal. We, therefore, direct the Clerk of the Supreme Court to enter judgment for the Appellees accordingly.

[¶ 3] We hereby order that this decision be published in the regular manner, as provided under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(c).

[¶ 4] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., MARY MUEHLEN MARING, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, DALE V. SANDSTROM and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2001: 12024: 120012026peak 2001 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-Riemers2001 ND 121, 630 N.W.2d 71
  2. MBI Oil and Gas, LLC v. Royalty Interests Partnership, LPNo. 1:22-cv-00187 (D.N.D. Apr. 18, 2024)

Most recent

  1. MBI Oil and Gas, LLC v. Royalty Interests Partnership, LPNo. 1:22-cv-00187 (D.N.D. Apr. 18, 2024)
  2. Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-Riemers2001 ND 121, 630 N.W.2d 71

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Strom-Sell v. Council for Concerned Citizens, Inc., 1999 ND 132, 597 N.W.2d 414 15
In re Estate of Opatz, 554 N.W.2d 813 (N.D. 1996) 16

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list