Maslowsky v. Cassidy

MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY, CHAIRMAN, ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMISSION

Maslowsky v. Cassidy, 385 U.S. 11 (1966)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 10, 1966
Docket: No. 574
Judges: Are, Douglas, Harlan, Noted, Should
Citations: 385 U.S. 1187 S. Ct. 9417 L. Ed. 2d 111966 U.S. LEXIS 558

Cited by 6

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Seigel354 A.2d 103 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
United States v. Dost636 F. Supp. 828 (S.D. Cal. 1986)
American Civil Liberties Union v. Reno929 F. Supp. 824 (E.D. Pa. 1996)
KUTV, INC. v. Conder668 P.2d 513 (Utah 1983)
Vadis Currie, Gregory Dollison and Brenda Seay, Individually and on Behalf of a Class v. Diamond Mortgage Corporation of Illinois859 F.2d 1538 (7th Cir. 1988)
National Metalcrafters v. Local 449, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers AFL-CIO465 N.E.2d 1001 (Ill. App. Ct. 1984)

Most recent

American Civil Liberties Union v. Reno929 F. Supp. 824 (E.D. Pa. 1996)
Vadis Currie, Gregory Dollison and Brenda Seay, Individually and on Behalf of a Class v. Diamond Mortgage Corporation of Illinois859 F.2d 1538 (7th Cir. 1988)
United States v. Dost636 F. Supp. 828 (S.D. Cal. 1986)
National Metalcrafters v. Local 449, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers AFL-CIO465 N.E.2d 1001 (Ill. App. Ct. 1984)
KUTV, INC. v. Conder668 P.2d 513 (Utah 1983)
State v. Seigel354 A.2d 103 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list