TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United States

Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United States

Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. United States, 385 U.S. 921 (1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 24, 1966
Docket
No. 429
Judges
Are, Granted, Should
Citations
385 U.S. 92187 S. Ct. 22817 L. Ed. 2d 1451966 U.S. LEXIS 448
Cited by 34

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 34 cases

View all citing references →
1966: 11967: 11968: 21969: 11970: 51971: 21972: 21973: 11974: 11975: 11977: 21980: 11982: 11983: 21985: 41986: 11987: 21988: 21998: 12015: 119662026peak 1970 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon Corporation624 F.2d 822 (8th Cir. 1980)
  2. Phillips v. Tobin403 F. Supp. 89 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)
  3. United States v. Kent Steven Allain671 F.2d 248 (7th Cir. 1982)
  4. United States v. Francis Alvin Johnson546 F.2d 1225 (5th Cir. 1977)
  5. United States v. Jose Campos Davila698 F.2d 715 (5th Cir. 1983)
  6. Tampa Phosphate Railroad Company v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company418 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1970)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Mancuso185 F. Supp. 3d 502 (M.D. Penn. 2015)
  2. United States v. Sanchez47 M.J. 794 (N.M.C.C.A. 1998)
  3. Fehir v. State755 P.2d 1107 (Alaska 1988)
  4. Fors v. United States14 Cl. Ct. 709 (Ct. Cl. 1988)
  5. Economic Development & Industrial Corp. v. United States13 Cl. Ct. 590 (Ct. Cl. 1987)
  6. In re McLean Industries74 B.R. 589 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list