TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Beer v. Attorney General of California

Beer v. Attorney Gen. of Cal., 386 U.S. 11 (1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 13, 1967
Docket
No. 858
Judges
Douglas, Noted, Should
Citations
386 U.S. 1187 S. Ct. 87817 L. Ed. 2d 7031967 U.S. LEXIS 2267
Cited by 4

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

An application for a stay addressed to Mr. Justice Douglas, and by him referred to the Court; is denied.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1967: 11968: 11969: 11970: 119672026peak 1967 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Harrison v. State1969 OK CR 263, 461 P.2d 1007
  2. John A. Metheany v. United States390 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1968)
  3. Bobby Joe Faubion v. United States424 F.2d 437 (10th Cir. 1970)
  4. Schack v. State201 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Most recent

  1. Bobby Joe Faubion v. United States424 F.2d 437 (10th Cir. 1970)
  2. Harrison v. State1969 OK CR 263, 461 P.2d 1007
  3. John A. Metheany v. United States390 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1968)
  4. Schack v. State201 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list