Cragan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Cragan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.

Cragan v. N.Y., New Haven & Hartford R.R., 386 U.S. 1035 (1967)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: May 8, 1967
Docket: No. 30
Citations: 386 U.S. 103587 S. Ct. 148818 L. Ed. 2d 6011967 U.S. LEXIS 1616

Cited by 16 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(aliens in deportation proceedings not entitled to counsel at government expense and notification of constitutional rights)

United States v. Floulis, 457 F. Supp. 1350 (W.D. Pa. 1978)

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

William Clyde Burton v. The United States404 F.2d 365 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
Joseph Paul v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service521 F.2d 194 (5th Cir. 1975)
Yam Sang Kwai v. Immigration & Naturalization Service411 F.2d 683 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
Daniel S. Urbina v. The United States428 F.2d 1280 (Ct. Cl. 1970)
Ampara Chavez-Raya and Gloria Quintanar De Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service519 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1975)
Thomas Glenn Jolley v. Immigration and Naturalization Service441 F.2d 1245 (5th Cir. 1971)

Most recent

Gardner v. CSX Transportation, Inc.498 S.E.2d 473 (W. Va. 1997)
United States v. Montoya-Robles935 F. Supp. 1196 (D. Utah 1996)
United States v. Floulis457 F. Supp. 1350 (W.D. Pa. 1978)
Nai Cheng Chen and Yuan Jung Chen v. Immigration and Naturalization Service537 F.2d 566 (1st Cir. 1976)
Joseph Paul v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service521 F.2d 194 (5th Cir. 1975)
Edmond Barthold v. U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service517 F.2d 689 (5th Cir. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list