TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lattimer v. Crystal Clear, Inc.

Lattimer v. Crystal Clear, Inc., 389 U.S. 8 (1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 9, 1967
Docket
No. 235
Citations
389 U.S. 888 S. Ct. 6219 L. Ed. 2d 81967 U.S. LEXIS 567

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 45 cases

View all citing references →
1968: 11969: 11970: 11971: 51972: 51973: 41974: 21975: 41976: 71977: 41978: 11980: 11981: 21982: 11983: 11984: 11987: 11988: 11998: 12000: 119682026peak 1976 · 7

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Property Owners Assn. of N. Bergen v. Tp. of N. Bergen378 A.2d 25 (N.J. 1977)
  2. Amer. Trial Lawyers Assoc. v. NJ Supreme Ct.316 A.2d 19 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1974)
  3. New Jersey Guild of Hearing Aid Dispensers v. Long384 A.2d 795 (N.J. 1978)
  4. Busik v. Levine307 A.2d 571 (N.J. 1973)
  5. Crescent Park Tenants Ass'n v. Realty Equities Corp.275 A.2d 433 (N.J. 1971)
  6. BURTON v. Sills248 A.2d 521 (N.J. 1968)

Most recent

  1. LDM, Inc. v. PRINCETON REG. HEALTH COMM.764 A.2d 507 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)
  2. City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation707 A.2d 493 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
  3. In re Determination of Executive Commission on Ethical Standards537 A.2d 713 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1988)
  4. Exxon Corp. v. Hunt534 A.2d 1 (N.J. 1987)
  5. IFA Ins. Co. v. New Jersey Dept. of Ins.478 A.2d 1203 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
  6. Trump Plaza v. ATLANTIC CITY MUN. UTILITIES470 A.2d 31 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list