Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United States

Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United States, 389 U.S. 851 (1967)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 9, 1967
Docket: No. 172
Judges: Consideration, Fortas, Took
Citations: 389 U.S. 85188 S. Ct. 4819 L. Ed. 2d 1201967 U.S. LEXIS 797

Cited by 62 4 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Fortas and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(error to grant permanent injunction following hearing on motion for preliminary injunction, because parties not aware prior to hearing that final relief was to be granted)

Herzog & Straus, a P'ship Organized Under the Laws of the State of N.Y. v. Grt Corp., 553 F.2d 789 (2d Cir. 1977)
(failure of court reporter to record a sidebar conference not prejudicial error per se)

State v. Bates, 933 P.2d 48 (Haw. 1997)

Cited by 62 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Bates933 P.2d 48 (Haw. 1997)
Jack Griffith v. Louie L. Wainwright772 F.2d 822 (11th Cir. 1985)
Esther HAYDEN v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation595 F.2d 994 (1st Cir. 1979)
Wayne Ernest Barker v. Ben Norman and Jack Ballas651 F.2d 1107 (5th Cir. 1981)
William R. Milburn and Richard v. Thompson v. The United States of America734 F.2d 762 (11th Cir. 1984)
Capital Films Corporation v. Charles Fries Productions, Inc. And American Broadcasting Company628 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1980)

Most recent

Dela Vergne v. Dela Vergne, III745 So. 2d 1271 (La. Ct. App. 1999)
First Financial Insurance v. Allstate Interior Demolition Corp.193 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1999)
State v. Bates933 P.2d 48 (Haw. 1997)
State v. Ganotisi902 P.2d 977 (Haw. App. 1995)
Hurst v. Southwest Miss. Legal Services Corp.610 So. 2d 374 (Miss. 1992)
United States v. Socrates Sierra, United States of America v. Emad Daniel Makhoul981 F.2d 123 (3d Cir. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list