TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wilson v. Wiman

Wilson v. Wiman, Reformatory Superintendent

Wilson v. Wiman, 390 U.S. 1042 (1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 29, 1968
Docket
No. 1176
Judges
Fortas
Citations
390 U.S. 104288 S. Ct. 1634

Opinion of the Court — Fortas

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Fortas,

with whom The Chief Justice

and Mr. Justice Douglas join, would grant certiorari in this case. In 1933 and 1935 petitioner was convicted in the state courts of Kentucky of housebreaking. In 1964, he was convicted of storehouse breaking. The earlier convictions were used in evidence pursuant to the Kentucky recidivist statute. Petitioner was sentenced to life in prison. The trial judge did not instruct the jury that the prior convictions could be used only for the limited purpose of the recidivist statute. I believe that we should hear this case to determine whether it is governed by Spencer v. Texas, 385 U. S. 554 (1967), and if so whether Spencer v. Texas should be reconsidered. See the separate opinion of The Chief Justice, in which I joined, 385 U. S., at 569 , and the dissent of Mr. Justice Brennan, in which Mr. Justice Douglas joined, 385 U. S., at 587 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554 (1966) 1,168

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list