TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Chimel v. California

Chimel v. California, 393 U.S. 1011 (1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 13, 1969
Docket
No. 770
Citations
393 U.S. 101189 S. Ct. 637

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Sup. Ct. Cal. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 958.] Joint motion to dispense with printing appendix denied. Request by petitioner for additional time for oral argument denied. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald M. George, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent on the joint motion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list