Amsbaugh v. Amsbaugh
Opinion
Filed 1/14/04 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2004 ND 1 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Thomas A. Skalicky, Defendant and Appellant Nos. 20030163-20030167 Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Nicole E. Foster (argued), State’s Attorney, and Marlyce A. Wilder (appeared), Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, ND 58802-2047, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kevin J. Chapman, Townsite Bldg., 2 nd Fl., P.O. Box 1920, Williston, ND 58802-1920, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Skalicky Nos. 20030163-20030167 Per Curiam.
[¶1] Thomas Skalicky appeals the order of the district court denying his application for post-conviction relief.
He argued his consecutive sentences for robbery under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-01 and burglary under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-02(2)(a) violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. Each offense to which Skalicky pleaded guilty “contains an element not contained in the other.” City of Fargo v. Martin Sewall Hector , 534 N.W.2d 821, 823 (N.D. 1995)(citing United States v. Dixon , 509 U.S. 688, 696 (1993), applying Blockburger v. United States , 284 U.S. 299 (1932)). Double jeopardy does not apply. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.