White v. Arizona ex rel. Eyman

White v. Arizona ex rel. Eyman, Warden

White v. Ariz. ex rel. Eyman, 393 U.S. 1121 (1969)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: March 3, 1969
Docket: No. 1235
Citations: 393 U.S. 112189 S. Ct. 100022 L. Ed. 2d 1261969 U.S. LEXIS 2416

Cited by 70 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(when defendants were stopped they appeared to be extremely nervous and this heightened the customs officers’ suspicions)

United States v. Carreon, 872 F.2d 1436 (10th Cir. 1989)
(“highly unlikely” harm occurred due to paraphrasing of indictment at voir dire)

United States v. Webb, 950 F.2d 226 (5th Cir. 1992)
(border searches “are restricted by requirement that they be reasonable”)

Witten v. Pitman, 613 F. Supp. 63 (S.D. Fla. 1985)

Cited by 70 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Marti321 F. Supp. 59 (E.D.N.Y. 1970)
United States v. Enrique Carreon872 F.2d 1436 (10th Cir. 1989)
United States v. Tussell441 F. Supp. 1092 (M.D. Penn. 1977)
The People v. Southwood274 N.E.2d 41 (Ill. 1971)
United States v. Becker347 F. Supp. 1039 (D. Mass. 1972)
Hampton v. Hanrahan600 F.2d 600 (7th Cir. 1979) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part

Most recent

D.E. v. John Doe834 F.3d 723 (6th Cir. 2016) · Concurrence
State v. Campbell975 A.2d 757 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009)
State v. Caldwell80 S.W.3d 31 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002)
United States v. Lewis Walter Hagedorn38 F.3d 520 (10th Cir. 1994)
United States v. Jerry Lynn Webb950 F.2d 226 (5th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Maldonado-Espinosa767 F. Supp. 1176 (D.P.R. 1991)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list