TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Interest of R.R.

Interest of R.R., 2004 ND 183
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
North Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 12, 2004
Docket
No. 20040265
Citations
2004 ND 183

Opinion

Filed 10/12/04 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2004 ND 183 Interest of R.R.

North Dakota State Hospital, Petitioner and Appellee v. R.R., Respondent and Appellant No. 20040265 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jay A. Schmitz, Assistant State’s Attorney, 511 Second Avenue SE, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, for petitioner and appellee.

Jodie K. Scherr, P.O. Box 356, Valley City, N.D. 58072-0356, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of R.R.

No. 20040265 Per Curiam.

[¶1] R.R. appeals a district court order authorizing his continued treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital at Jamestown until November 19, 2004, or until further court order.  R.R. argues he is improperly being held in the secure forensic unit of the State Hospital, and the district court erred in not ruling he should be treated in a less secure unit.  A district court must assess, before making its decision in an involuntary treatment hearing, the availability and appropriateness of treatment programs for the respondent “other than hospitalization.”  N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-21(1).  The statute requires a district court only to determine whether treatment other than hospitalization is appropriate, not which unit in the hospital is appropriate.  We, therefore, affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring I concur in the result.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2005: 120052026peak 2005 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Pb2005 ND 201, 706 N.W.2d 78

Most recent

  1. In re Pb2005 ND 201, 706 N.W.2d 78

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list