Anderson v. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency

ANDERSON v. URBAN RENEWAL & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF PADUCAH, KENTUCKY

Anderson v. Urban Renewal & Cmty. Dev. Agency, 395 U.S. 823 (1969)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 23, 1969
Docket: No. 1414
Citations: 395 U.S. 82389 S. Ct. 213323 L. Ed. 2d 7381969 U.S. LEXIS 1170

Cited by 15 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(a vote of the people cannot validate and constitutionalize anything which violates a provision of the constitution, and that the question of constitutionality is justiciable even after the voters have adopted such a provision.)

Mellow v. Pizzingrilli, 800 A.2d 350 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002)

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.507 A.2d 323 (Pa. 1986)
Norman E. Wymbs and Ann R. Cassady v. Republican State Executive Committee of Florida719 F.2d 1072 (11th Cir. 1983)
The Ripon Society, Inc. v. National Republican Party the Ripon Society, Inc. v. National Republican Party525 F.2d 567 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
Goodheart v. Casey565 A.2d 757 (Pa. 1989)
Livingston v. Ogilvie250 N.E.2d 138 (Ill. 1969)
Priest v. Polk912 S.W.2d 902 (Ark. 1995)

Most recent

Mellow v. Pizzingrilli800 A.2d 350 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002)
Lincoln Party ex rel. Robinson v. General Assembly682 A.2d 1326 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1996)
Priest v. Polk912 S.W.2d 902 (Ark. 1995)
PVI Associates v. Redevelopment Authority (In re PVI Associates)181 B.R. 210 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1995)
Goodheart v. Casey565 A.2d 757 (Pa. 1989)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,705, 25 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 658 Willco Kuwait (Trading) S.A.K. v. Peter J843 F.2d 618 (1st Cir. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list