Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. United States

Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. United States, 396 U.S. 828 (1969)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 13, 1969
Docket: No. 228
Citations: 396 U.S. 82890 S. Ct. 7824 L. Ed. 2d 79163 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 7041969 U.S. LEXIS 903

Cited by 23 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(following BASF, and stating that "the addition of a method step in a product claim, which product is not patentably distinguishable from the prior art, cannot impart patentability to the old product")

Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date], 439 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2006)

Cited by 23 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Thomas F. Danehy680 F.2d 1311 (11th Cir. 1982)
United States v. Lewis7 M.J. 348 (1979)
State v. Hoffman804 P.2d 577 (Wash. 1991)
Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]439 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
Rosemount, Inc. v. Beckman Instruments, Inc.727 F.2d 1540 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
In re James A. Smith and James H. McLaughlin and Sterling Drug, Inc.714 F.2d 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1983)

Most recent

Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]439 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
State v. Casanova738 A.2d 668 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999)
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation974 F.2d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation970 F.2d 834 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
State v. Hoffman804 P.2d 577 (Wash. 1991)
United States v. Charles P. Streich759 F.2d 579 (7th Cir. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list