Noga v. United States
Noga, Special Administrator v. United States
Noga v. United States, 396 U.S. 841 (1969)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(noting that filing a false return under § 7206(1)
-
(dismissing FTCA suit in which United States was technical defendant in place of negligent federal driver because Federal Drivers Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)-(e) (1964), rendered government employee driver immune from suit)
-
(adopting rule that an agent forfeits compensation for breach of the duty of loyalty although part of his services may have been properly performed)
Cited by 63 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. Noble C. Beasley
- Tazelaar v. United States
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. Mulei
- Merrill Benton v. United States of America and the United States Postal Service
- Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation -Counterclaimant- And
- Mary E. Hammond, Individually and Mary E. Hammond as She is the of the Estate of Charles E. Hammond v. United States
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.