TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States

Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States Chambers v. Beauchamp, Administrator Anders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Jackson v. California Neely v. United States Clinton v. California Lane v. Pucci Dvorsky v. United States Wolff v. Foley Wendt v. Dillin, Judges, U. S. District Court Resseguie v. Follette, Warden Daugherty v. United States Cantrell v. United States Fletcher v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent

Bay Sound Transp. Co. v. United States, 396 U.S. 1031 (1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 12, 1970
Docket
Nos. 507; No. 554; No. 583; No. 160; No. 602; No. 632; No. 658; No. 781; No. 782; No. 843; No. 866; No. 959; No. 978; No. 1016
Citations
396 U.S. 103190 S. Ct. 55024 L. Ed. 2d 528
Cited by 3

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ante, p. 928;

ante, p. 942;

ante, p. 958;

ante, p. 942;

ante, p. 917;

ante, p. 23;

ante, p. 943;

ante, p. 970;

ante, p. 945;

ante, p. 899;

ante, p. 971;

ante, p. 947;

ante, p. 947; and ante, p. 948. Petitions for rehearing denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →
1970: 11972: 11980: 119702026peak 1970 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. William L. Mitchell and Marian S. Mitchell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue428 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1970)
  2. State v. Latham494 P.2d 192 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972)
  3. Mager v. United States499 F. Supp. 37 (M.D. Penn. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Mager v. United States499 F. Supp. 37 (M.D. Penn. 1980)
  2. State v. Latham494 P.2d 192 (N.M. Ct. App. 1972)
  3. William L. Mitchell and Marian S. Mitchell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue428 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list