TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

New York City Housing Authority v. Escalera

N.Y. City Hous. Auth. v. Escalera, 400 U.S. 853 (1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 12, 1970
Docket
No. 343
Citations
400 U.S. 85391 S. Ct. 54
Cited by 19

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 2d Cir. Motions of respondents Escalera et al. for leave to proceed in forma 'pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 19 cases

View all citing references →
1971: 31972: 21973: 31974: 11975: 21977: 11978: 11983: 31988: 12000: 219712026peak 1971 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kundrat v. District of Columbia106 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2000)
  2. Hosea Simmons and Andrea Williams v. William Ryan Drew and the Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee716 F.2d 1160 (7th Cir. 1983) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
  3. Kilpatrick v. Riley98 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2000)
  4. Germain v. Recht-Goldin-Siegel Properties567 F. Supp. 384 (E.D. Wis. 1983)
  5. In re Registration for Cooperative Conversion of Woodcliff Gardens539 A.2d 1264 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1988)
  6. Bogacki v. Board of Supervisors489 P.2d 537 (Cal. 1971)

Most recent

  1. Kundrat v. District of Columbia106 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2000)
  2. Kilpatrick v. Riley98 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2000)
  3. In re Registration for Cooperative Conversion of Woodcliff Gardens539 A.2d 1264 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1988)
  4. Hosea Simmons and Andrea Williams v. William Ryan Drew and the Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee716 F.2d 1160 (7th Cir. 1983) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
  5. Germain v. Recht-Goldin-Siegel Properties567 F. Supp. 384 (E.D. Wis. 1983)
  6. Chase v. Binghamton Housing Authority91 A.D.2d 1147 (1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list