Farrell v. United States
Farrell v. United States, 404 U.S. 853 (1971)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(addressing whether employees promoted from technical to analyst positions were no longer qualified to be included in the technical unit)
-
(upholding convictions of thirty-five and twenty years for mail fraud violations which did not involve loss of life)
-
(“uncontradicted” evidence that defendants “were willing to supply cocaine in large quantities and of excellent quality”)
Cited by 58 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Williams v. Herbert
- Zeito v. Girdich
- Horne v. Perlman
- RI Pub. Tel. Auth. v. RI Labor Rel. Bd.
- Rhode Island Public Telecommunications Authority v. Rhode Island State Labor Relations Board
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,549, 18 Ucc rep.serv.2d 588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Phillip Elliott, Charles O. Farrar, Receiver- Kenneth J. Davis, Linda J. Davis, Leroy H. Moeller, as Personal Representative of the Estates of Adolph Hagstrom, Squire J. Kingston, Elizabeth Woods, Caroline Estelle, Lynnis H. McClain Ted Masco, Anita K. Hailey, Earl Setterblade, Francis Setterblade, Lloyd Schutzman, Shirley Schutzman, Albert C. Heil, Melvin Burkhardt, Rosa Ella Burkhardt, Howard Dore, Ruth Dore, Gerald J. Braun, Christie Braun, Monica Brooke Braun, C. Albert Ducharme Trust and Catherine F. Ducharme Trust, Seaton F. McDaniel Josephine McDaniel Trudy and Sidney Kleiner
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.